Both statements (from Stan during yesterday’s meeting) can be correct…

1. There is no current plan to accept AUA ratings.
2. The club by-law that limits the requirement to USHPA (and IPPI) ratings, is up for review (ref).

So one may deduct that either…

• There is a desire/plan to accept ratings from another (yet to be named) association, maybe one that does not exist now (AUA could just be used as a template).
• There is no reason to limit the club to one specific association’s rating system, or use that freedom as leverage in future negotiations (with USHPA for example).

The future will tell, which of the above was closer to the truth.