Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Gene and Nicole #19256

    FYI.   I already downloaded the website.   I don’t see any indemnification clause for any of the board Director on the website.

    in reply to: Gene and Nicole #19255

    Dear Luke,

    Although I haven’t had the pleasure of meeting or conversing with Billy before, it seems like you are bulling both Billy and Gene.  I’d like to share some thoughts regarding your apparent familiarity with civil law. To truly claim expertise in this field, it typically requires extensive experience, including participation in over ten trials within both state and federal courts over the past few years, as well as facing losses in cases that should have been won. Additionally, it involves navigating situations where you’ve played a role in bankrupting someone who has crossed you and demonstrating a mastery of attorney management, including the selection of the right attorney for specific legal tasks. Without these experiences, one might argue that a comprehensive understanding of civil law remains elusive.

    While I’m still in the process of comprehending the ongoing situation, I’d like to propose a hypothetical scenario: If you and I were to engage in a legal dispute, I would be willing to wager that, in terms of legal expenses, for every dollar I spend, you might find yourself expending two dollars. Please note, however, that there are presently no grounds for any legal action between us.

    Gene has been a valuable source of assistance to me on multiple occasions in the hills, and I feel a sense of gratitude towards him. This is the primary reason I have taken an interest in this matter. I held a deep appreciation for the points Jana articulated, up until the moment she presented two videos that appeared to be taken out of context. It appears that there may be a concerted effort to target a man who is battling cancer, with allegations suggesting an attempt to drive him out of business. My initial assessment suggests that not only have our organization’s bylaws been disregarded, but many other causes of actions taken also appear to raise legal concerns. To this end, I have already sought legal counsel on this matter.

    It appears that Gene has effectively resolved the issues surrounding both horses and dogs. The remaining concern, as I see it, pertains to ensuring that Sandy feels at liberty to offer services similar to those provided by Gene and Nicole. I am optimistic that our collective efforts within the community can lead to the reinstatement of Gene’s membership and the resolution of this matter, thereby preventing further financial losses and personal distress.

    Sincerely,

    Dennis

    in reply to: Gene and Nicole #19236

    Bille

    Good point.  I pay close to a million in legal fee every year.  I don’t mind throwing money to support Genes case.

    in reply to: Gene and Nicole #19233

    Thanks that is all I ask.   I am sure many people will zoom in on the 9th to hear this.

    in reply to: Gene and Nicole #19230

    If it was followed to the letter why was he not given the privilege of being at the meeting?  That privilege was clearly stated in the bylaw.

    in reply to: Gene and Nicole #19228

    According to the club’s bylaws, I was meant to have an opportunity to discuss these matters with the board members, but no such meeting has taken place to date. Consequently, I feel compelled to appeal to you, the membership, through this message in lieu of a formal proceeding.

    Is it true that Gene lost his membership without Gene given the right to defend himself in a secret ballot of executive?  It is my understanding that the by laws gives Gene the right to defend himself.

     

    in reply to: Gene and Nicole #19227

    Here is the bylaw as I see it.

     

    Article Xl – Discipline

     

    Section 1. Discipline of Members:

    A. Charges of professional dishonesty, working against, or performing actions contrary to, the principles and purpose of the Society, and/or injuring the professional standing of a member may be filed in a written statement signed by five general members in good standing and sent to the executive Board.

    B. The accused member shall be notified in writing of the action and shall have the privilege of being present at a special or regular meeting of the executive Board, at which the charges will be considered.

    C. The member may be suspended by a two-thirds vote or expelled by a three-fourths vote of the executive Board.

     

    For the sake of transparency I suggest we put this to a vote.  If 2/3 of the members votes Gene out so be it.  Why is this not put to a vote?