Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: crestline wx and cam? #8034
    David Webb
    General Member

    I pulled the coordinates used for the NWS charts directly from the old site. If they need updating then I’m good with that. Post links that are to closer locations and I can update those.

    I was thinking of adding in more delay between each frame (just to make that 15 minutes play a bit slower) – will put together a couple of experiments and post them to see what’s the least objectionable.

    in reply to: crestline wx and cam? #8027
    David Webb
    General Member

    Great! I actually haven’t touched the Crestline camera, so it’s possible something else is at play there (connection speed, computer, etc).

    I had left off the temperatures from the graphs, since as I recall, only one of the weather stations was actually reporting temp data. Once CRS and AJX get updated to start sending their data again, I’ll take another look to see what we can get as far as temp goes.

    For forecast temps, you can also click on the “View Details” link below the NOAA NWS forecast graphs on the right (underneath the windgrams). That will show you the full graph of all forecast data (temp, wind, etc).

    in reply to: Forum needs to show Most Recent Posts #8025
    David Webb
    General Member

    Threaded replies are now off.

    in reply to: Forum needs to show Most Recent Posts #8016
    David Webb
    General Member

    Ok – baby steps:

    • Main forum view has been updated – clicking on “Forums” anywhere on the site gets you to the main forum view, which now shows Topics sorted by last activity.
    • Each topic in the list shows its title (clicking the title takes you to the topic itself), who started it (clicking the author name takes you to their profile), which forum it was posted in (clicking that takes you to the list of topics in that forum), and when the last post (reply) was (clicking that takes you directly to that last reply in the topic).
    • On mobile sizes, this topic list is compressed a bit to accommodate the small screen – title (clicking that takes you to the topic itself), last post link is directly underneath (clicking that takes you to the last reply in that topic), and author.
    • Paging buttons (previous / next) are at the bottom of the topic listing (if you’re super bored and just want to flip through all of the topics in chronological order of last activity).
    • Removed “Active Topics” from the sidebar, as it was redundant with the main listing (that also means less scrolling on mobile sizes if you want to get directly to the recent replies or list of all forums).

    There are a few cleanup items to do to turn off the threaded replies – that’s on the way.

    in reply to: Forum needs to show Most Recent Posts #8010
    David Webb
    General Member

    Copy that!

    Threaded replies (nested replies) can easily be turned on/off. Will test a few things out and turn that off, since that one’s been mentioned more than once (you and Jerome).

    Referring back to the alternate view I added here, this one does the following already:

    • Topics are sorted by the last reply (so the topic with the most recent reply is at the top, and topics that haven’t had a reply in a while are farther down).
    • The “Last Post” column on the right in that list has a link directly to the last reply in that topic. This gives you access to the topic (for those who might be jumping in on a new topic) or directly to the last reply (if you want to go straight to that). This is how all of the other topic lists work as well (if you look in any forum, each topic has a “Last Post” column which takes you directly to the last reply in that topic).
    • Topics (and forums) that contain content that you haven’t read yet (as long as you’re logged into the site) will show you the dark blue bar next to them to make them easy to spot.

    It sounds like if we switch the main Forum list (what you get when you click on “Forums” in the main nav) to the new one (linked above) and disable threaded replies – does that (mostly) solve everything? We can always make more adjustments, but if doing those 2 things makes everyone’s browsing/posting/bantering process a lot easier, then those are easy to do.

    in reply to: crestline wx and cam? #7994
    David Webb
    General Member

    Ok – Twister variation with less colors is now up. Let’s try it out for a while and see how it goes. Also, this is another version of that with black direction marker (instead of the whole marker being the direction color). Chime in if you think one is easier to read than the other.

    Screenshot 2020-04-15 12.07.28

    in reply to: Forum needs to show Most Recent Posts #7992
    David Webb
    General Member

    Based on the above, here’s one possible alternate view that we could use for the main Forums homepage (what you get when you click “Forums” in the main nav).

    That’s essentially the “Active Topics” that you get in the sidebar (topic with the most recent reply is at the top, sorted by last topic reply); stickied topics are in yellow at the top.

    Also, you’ve likely noticed that the sidebar has been updated as well – main forum listing got moved to the bottom to make the active topics and recent replies quicker to get to – and the extra search bar at the top of the forum listing has been removed.

    Shout with thoughts on those.

    in reply to: crestline wx and cam? #7991
    David Webb
    General Member

    I sense a new variation on the fly-in bomb drops…

    in reply to: crestline wx and cam? #7874
    David Webb
    General Member

    Here’s a variation (less “steps”; green is good, anything with red in it is bad).

    compass

    in reply to: Forum needs to show Most Recent Posts #7872
    David Webb
    General Member

    I hear you – just haven’t gotten to that yet.

    in reply to: crestline wx and cam? #7871
    David Webb
    General Member

    The old one is not an option – due to several reasons that I won’t go into, I was forced to recreate the graphs from scratch. It sounds like you’re just not sold on the colors currently being used – like I said, we can make adjustments to those. I’ll put together a couple of variations for everyone to take a look at.

    in reply to: crestline wx and cam? #7867
    David Webb
    General Member

    I completely agree with you. Full-disclosure: I am one of those people (deuteranopia, which is a red/green deficiency).  For me, I find the new ones a lot easier to see the differences in the different directions, but obviously I can’t speak for everyone. In my opinion, I think the old graphs/compasses had too many “steps” in color (almost a full gradient all the way around) and I had to really stare at it to figure out what direction it was telling me.

    Perhaps a run-through of the process for creating the new ones might help to see where I was going with them (maybe boring, maybe interesting – you be the judge)? Here goes nothing:

    My primary concern was changing the color/direction as little as possible (trying to keep the pitchforks at bay) – both the old and the new had NE/Red, SE/Yellow, SW/Green, NW/Blue (and gradients in between those). If it were just me using it, I actually wouldn’t even bother with the color (maybe red for everything that has a north component, green for our ideal directions, and yellow for iffy/cross) as I think it would be much easier to read, but I know we all like high resolution in our weather readings. Even better (at least, to me), would be to include direction arrows along the graph lines so there’s absolutely no ambiguity about what direction it’s saying (that’s an issue because there would be way too many arrows packed in along those lines – would be impossible to read).

    I decided to reduce the full-blown color gradient all the way around the compass down to 16 colors (1 for each primary/secondary compass direction). I thought the harder “steps” between directions would give greater clarity in reading the graphs (easier to tell which direction, since the colors would each be a bit more “different”). Sticking with the same theme as the old graphs (NE/Red, SW/Green, etc), I picked a bright red, blue, green, and yellow for the main directions (NE, SE, SW, NW) and then ran those colors through a tool to generate a gradient between each (that produced 3 “steps” between each main directional color). Same exact colors are used in the compasses and in the graphs (so that we’re using a consistent “language” everywhere on the site).

    So the questions I’ve had in my head (maybe the same ones you’re considering now):

    Do we just need to futz around with the color selections and make adjustments there (basically just picking slightly different colors to bump up the saturation/contrast)?

    Are we going about it wrong and should we change it a bit more (perhaps going down to 8 compass directions / 8 colors; switching the primary colors/directions to N/E/S/W, so N is Red, S is green, etc and then generating the “steps” between those instead; switching to holfuy‘s model of green for good flyable direction, yellow for “good enough” and nothing/red for not flyable; or, something else entirely – maybe red for all of the north directions, and then blue/green/yellow for everything that has a south component)?

    in reply to: Weather Page Discussion #7864
    David Webb
    General Member

    Not sure what the ask is here, but we are incorporating that exact data into the weather station graphs already (all of the thicker lines on the graph that show the future are NOAA NWS forecasts from that exact site. Same goes for the forecast graphs on the right side (under the windgrams). Let me know if you had something specific in mind.

    in reply to: crestline wx and cam? #7863
    David Webb
    General Member

    Ken is working on getting into the Wx on Crestline and AJX – should be back anytime now (other post here).

    We can work on the color palette for the compass, but I struggled with the old colors (found it super hard to read). I’m sure there are lots of differing opinions on this one, but we can try a few variations out to see which one works for the most people.

    in reply to: Weather Page Discussion #7859
    David Webb
    General Member

    Excellent! It’s easy to get decent load times when we’re at home on our computers, but since 15 minute loops are coming in at around a couple of MBs at a somewhat low resolution (you’ll notice I dropped the size as well), it’s likely to take several seconds if you’re at the LZ on your phone. All depends on your connection speed, but it’s a start!