Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2020 Bylaw Changes & Vote Discussion #7291
    David Webb
    General Member

    Discussion about allowing the board to adjust membership dues:

    The current bylaws, as they stand now, require the following in regards to dues/memberships:

    • Dues be paid on a specific day every year (June 1)
    • Dues have a proration schedule if they are paid at a different time than the normal membership time
    • Changes in dues are allowed only by an in-person general member vote
    • Amendments must be sent out to members 30 days prior to a meeting

    Since 30 days are needed to allow everyone time to vote on important issues, this means that any change to bylaws or dues requires 60 days to pass. Online tools (this discussion forum, election/voting tools, etc) are already in use to help us all facilitate discussion and voting, so there is little reason why we can’t be a bit more agile.

    There are many reasons why the board is suggesting to be allowed to adjust rates. Here are a few:

    • The specific issue that we encountered this year (RRRG demanded a change to how we charge visiting pilots which required quick action; we could not address this demand in a timely fashion without changes to the bylaws since the term of that membership type was specifically defined)
    • Ability to “dial in” on the best combinations of fees and terms for all pilots; as the board conducts reviews of club finances on a regular basis, we may discover from accounting data that adjustments are needed to address things such as increased club expenditures, lower visiting pilot revenues (possibly because prices are seen as being too high, COVID-19, increase in out-of-town vs local SoCal pilots paying the visitor fee, encouraging local pilots to sign up for the annual membership instead of the visiting, etc)
    • Promotions/attracting visiting pilots – if the board wants to run, let’s say, a week promotion with a reduced visitor fee to attract visiting pilots, that would currently require a bylaw change
    • Board members pay membership fees too (no free lunches) – we have no incentive to raising rates for anyone (member or visitor) other than to ensure the club (which is barely breaking even) stays afloat
    in reply to: 2020 Bylaw Changes & Vote Discussion #7290
    David Webb
    General Member

    Discussion about RRRG requirements (eliminating day use fees / operating as a commercial flight park):

    Board members have had a lot of back and forth with the RRRG (USHPA’s insurer) regarding how we operate. Steve Rohrbaugh, who is the San Diego club president, is also the RRRG USHPA chapter liason and we have been in touch with him regarding this, since he has had to make changes to how the SD club handles this as well – San Diego has moved to a one month / one year membership model.

    They have been very clear (flat out told us) that in order to avoid being viewed as a “commercial flight park” (which would mean a whole bunch of other hoops to jump through and money), that day use fees must be eliminated. All fees should be “memberships,” and that the minimum term on memberships should be no less than one month. Period.

    It’s in all of our best interests to play nice with USHPA (and RRRG is their insurer). I’m learning that some of us have a bit of disagreement with USHPA in general (whether they should just go away, change their rules, etc), but for now, they’re what we’ve got – closest thing we have to a governing body in the US that protects our sport.

    in reply to: PHI / Beat (Mid B paraglider) #7287
    David Webb
    General Member

    Bwahahaha – hadn’t noticed your vehicle/weapon comparisons to your Buzz before. Excellent.

    in reply to: Sunday March 8, 2020 #7270
    David Webb
    General Member

    Just watched the track – that was quite the climb right after you launched! Was watching the lift/sink and think I saw a spiral in there too.

    in reply to: Feb 23, 2020 #7200
    David Webb
    General Member

    Yep – all good! Definitely worse ways I could have spent a Sunday. Every launch is good practice.

    in reply to: Fun Feb 16, 2020 #7185
    David Webb
    General Member

    Climbing out from the 750 – that’s the dream, right? Looks like an awesome flight.

    in reply to: Beware of Dog #7168
    David Webb
    General Member

    Saga continues – after a great day of flying yesterday, a spectator in the LZ had their dog off-leash and as I was folding up, I looked over and the dog was sitting on my wing. Owner didn’t seem too concerned about it, and I was lucky this time that I didn’t have new holes.

    in reply to: Saturday Feb 8, 2020. Marshall + Soboba were fun #7167
    David Webb
    General Member

    Was mighty goooooood up there.

    Edit: good idea, Jana, for posting the flight track. Here’s mine.

    in reply to: First Flight in Lake Elsinore #7098
    David Webb
    General Member

    Awesome! I hope to fly there sooner or later. Do they have an LZ at the moment? I sometimes hear yes and sometimes hear no.

    in reply to: Memorable PG Tandem Passenger #7025
    David Webb
    General Member

    Hilarious  :D