Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Major Decision being considered by CSS. #17237

    Tom,

    At the meeting where we viewed the new shade structure designs, I was against building the current structure due to the cost. I questioned where the funds would come from since we no longer hire monitors and have done away with fly ins that generate money.

    He told me and a few others sitting next to me that his Hollywood friends and actually said Brian Cranston and others will be more than happy to donate the funds.

    When he was asked a few weeks later about the donations from his Hollywood friends he said, I never said that!

    Flip flop

     

    in reply to: Major Decision being considered by CSS. #17233

    Tom,

    9Yes a volunteer like the rest of us but flip flops when cornered.  Makes alot of promises, then when cornered, says it was never said!

    in reply to: Major Decision being considered by CSS. #17205

    This is my 2 cents

    The club over the years has put alot of effort into making the LZ/Ranch what it was a few years back when camping, fly ins and membership breakfasts thrived. There was members who volunteered to install the sprinklers and run electric lines from John’s house up to the pond and back down to the shade structure and wifi was installed for our members.

    Unfortunately all that has gone away due to the last five years board of directors.

    5 years ago the BOD said “We can police our selves” So we got rid of the site monitor. Why? The site monitor not only checks pilots for CSS and USHPA membership, but also collected day use fees and promoted club membership to non members.

    How much money has the club lost over the last 5 years?

    If the club brought back a monitor instead of “Self Policing” and brought back Fly ins, which we had 4 a year, those funds could help pay monthly payments and possibly contribute towards the purchase of the Ranch.

    So we cut ties with the Ranch and they decide to sell, we no longer have water (potable and sprinklers) Electricity, WiFi and future camping and pond usage.

    This should decided by the members and not BOD!

    The money spent on the new shade structure could have made a down payment!

     

    in reply to: Shade Structure Voting Reults are In! #13301

    Jai Pal yes it’s me and only me. There’s no need to reach out to me via Facebook’s Messenger we have this forum to reach out to. It’s called TRANSPARENCY!

     

    in reply to: Shade Structure Voting Reults are In! #13294
    1. I was just telling the truth Jai Pal. I guess you don’t remember hmmm. I have no reason to lie to you or anyone else.
      We had a contractor build us a 2nd bathroom and he said alot of stuff but when questioned he seem to forget as well.
      As far as budget we only have $12000 to work with which with the cost of building materials now that’s only going to pay for the concrete then what? We go another season without the shade structure?
      As far as donations I’ve put alot of my time and sweat making sure we had electricity, water, wifi along with working flyins. That’s my donation.
    in reply to: Shade Structure Voting Reults are In! #13276

    So no glass?

    You Jai Pal told me that it wouldn’t be a problem getting donations from some Hollywood actors!

    So Where’s the donations?

     

    in reply to: Shade Structure Voting Reults are In! #13271

    My concerns for the Taj Mahal is cost. Our current budget is $12000. I heard that we need to pour concrete and the outdoor kitchen is going to be demolished which seems like a waste of time and waste of money to me.

    As far as the glass goes, who’s going to take care of cleaning (we cant even keep the container clean and organized) and what about vandalism?

    I was told that the Hollywood Elites  have no problem donating so where’s the donations??

    Most projects are started with a budget. We have $12000

    It’s a shade structure not a FBO