Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
REI’s frontman, Ted Gablin, already made one. Havent checked the accuracy though.
We all got to know Ted from the “race to the brewery” day back in 2019.

AKA a LFR – “Lukes Flying Restriction”.
What about artificial turf? It appears water alone isnt doing the trick
![20241003_145449_resized[1]](https://crestlinesoaring.org/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/21070/fb1vl8h6idgf2msdr22ue0grghmg082n.jpg)
TFR size reduced yesterday.

and..The convergence was well marked. 16.7k base. Sailplanes were out in force Sat and Sun flying the line from Campo to Grapevine….and back! They have ADS-B onboard and can be followed on the flight trackers.
![20241006_145739[1]](https://crestlinesoaring.org/wp-content/uploads/hm_bbpui/21069/zuxu0i14gi46hxhj5jkgwpqb954a9dy6.jpg)
Luke, help me find the part in the closure order where it mentions the airspace closure departing from the boundaries shown at tfr.faa.gov.

I see the order hasnt been clarified by less ambiguous language.
It doesnt specify residents of any specific area. So, i read it to include any and all. Cant read their minds, only what is written.
Use of USFS lands is what is what is covered by the order. Use of FS lands for launching gliders along with all other uses except accessing private property, are prohibited due to the fact that the launch, or the activity occurs on FS land.
The order covers only FS property noted in Ex. A, not private property and definitely not airspace.
<p style=”text-align: left;”>Just sayin. In case the crime and punishment loyer POleece types start thinking that seeing a glider in the sky constitutes proof of violating the order.</p>Look at the map?
your links refer 2 different orders with 2 different maps. ORDER NO. 05-12-00-24-09 is the most recent and more restrictive. The order from Sept 8 had the closure boundary at hwy 18. It is now all the way to I 15.


Gene’s got his mind right. Got his dirt outa boss’s yahd.
maybe the BOD’s crime and punishment committee can meet with their handlers to review the sentence and grant a parole hearing or something. Gene seems to be cured and Max is out of sight.
So can it be considered abandoned? 5 days and no retrieval. Put it on offerup?

This discussion is how one attempts to wring out the facts Jerome. Tom asked a valid question.
Linda sullies the discussion in her usual fashion by berating the previous board. Secretary says I’m misinformed. Fact of the matter is, the membership is uninformed.
Im a contractor, so yes a fence is a no brainer. I had a hand in building the shade structure, remember? Maybe before your time. A long ago conversation with a ranch guy mentioned a fence around the pond. Maybe its more now. Maybe just another reason to say “we cant”. I dunno. Not much info flowing out these days.
Seems to me there is more drowning exposure now than ever before. No gate, no fence, no eyes on the path there. There must be some sort of rationale behind those choices. Fair enough.
-
AuthorPosts
