Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Well we know they are not separate anymore since the treasurer stated “it’s all just one pile of money” and the “camping” fees have been diverted directly to the shade structure. As expenses for Gracie gas and upkeep grows- she’s been BUSY grading the new “camping” area- it seems lopsided that fees are going to a project that was promised to be separate. So strange that no one on the board has cleared this up. But they did raise annual dues🧐 Too bad we aren’t being paid to receive dirt for which the excavator company would normally have to pay.
can’t wait for those “meeting minutes”! 😜
Anyone can watch the video recording of the entire meeting and Jai Pal, who likes to rewrite history or simply delete his past lies, misdirections, and misogyny, can’t actually delete the video that is on my Facebook account.
Posting meeting minutes doesn’t require anything but using the forum. Like I did. I wait with ‘bated breath…..
And fees collected go to shade structure, unless you somehow make it be for CSS expenses like it was always supposed to be.
Not surprised that the shade structure financials are secret
Not very detailed regarding shade structure donations and/or expenditures.
I repeat: is there another sheet that includes them?Just wow.
Tim, on my Facebook live at 1:13 (an hour and 13 min in) Stan was very very clear regarding the BODs plan that AUA is not being considered as an alternative to membership for flying CSS.
So why did Stan say there was NO PLAN to accept AUA alongside USHPA for membership? Did I misunderstand his answer when I asked specifically yesterday? Hopefully the detailed meeting minutes will clear this up.
Holy fucking shit. I hope to see some consistency in banning members (and out of control “board members” – and I use that phrase LOOSELY) for attacking members in this forum.
President Stan said,
“ The Board has not been planning or considering getting out of USHPA, changing the rating system, or obtaining another rating provider. ”
so are we going to scrap this whole discussion and devote the meeting Saturday to all of the other topics?
Jerome : nailed it. Methinks this is the rationale by some of the parties proposing this.
“Possible loophole for pilots/instructors banned from USHPA, to fly/teach at our site. ”Very thorough and thoughtful details. Thanks for taking the time and effort to detail this.
Right here, Dan.
https://www.ushpa.org/page/accident-analysisOr you can Google USHPA accident reports
Great discussion! Will there be a link for members unable to attend in person and only through Zoom or Microsoft ?
-
AuthorPosts
