Home Forums Pilot Alerts & TFRs National Forest Closures

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 42 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #10213
    Marc Deschenes
    General Member

    Lawn Darts!
    Time for Mario to drag out his brother’s old glider.

    25C73CEE-47BE-4CFC-B107-AC8C9E4F0B06

    #10214
    David Webb
    Board Member

    That looks like it wants to stab me in a dark alley 🙂

    #10217
    George Stebbins
    General Member

    OK.  That picture/caption is funny!!!

    #10222
    James Hall
    General Member

    The Marshall webcam seems to show at least someone who doesn’t give a shit about being a decent citizen. 1500 local. I hope they hiked in at least.

    #10223
    David Webb
    Board Member

    Lame-o alert.

    #10224

    The ” regional forester” lacks the legitimate authority to decree and enforce any closure of public land.  Nor does he have even a name in the media at this point.  Let’s give him a name, and determine whether   the closure is legal, and justified before licking boots.  MMMK?

    Randy Moore is the “Pacific Southwest Regional Forester” and self proclaimed environmentalist responsible for the closure, and idiotic policies aligned with the anthropogenic CO2 emission global warming hoax.  This asshole is a propaganda parrot, and has no authority to impose a closure of public land and no authority to use USFS personal as law enforcement, for a law that doesn’t exist.

    He’s merely a self proclaimed voodoo high priest of an illegitimate cult of authority.

    https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/r5/landmanagement/?cid=STELPRD3801435

    ” climate change” is the dog whistle for useful idiots like mr. Moore who can’t keep their lying propaganda campaigns straight.  The issue is man caused warming from CO2 emission and there’s no evidence anywhere in the public domain that proves man’s insignificant emission of a trace gas is the primary driver of global temperature regulation processes.

     

    #10225

    OOOPS.  ” 16 U.S. Code § 471.Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, § 704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792″.

    the basis for the assumption of authority to deny access to public land has been repealed, meaning the regional forester lacks the authority to deny public access. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/471

    #10226
    Mario Miralles
    General Member

    “He’s merely a self proclaimed voodoo high priest of an illegitimate cult of authority.”

     

    Couldn’t have said it better…..and I’m not referring to the FS Randy Moore.

    #10227
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    To keep current with USFS Region 5 Alerts & Notices:

    https://www.fs.usda.gov/main/r5/alert-notices#orders

    https://twitter.com/usfs_r5 ( this link is less useful)

    #10230

    Perhaps you can comment on 16 U.S.C. 551 that cites USC 471, a repealed law, as it’s basis for authority to enact closures of public land.  The link to the repealed law is in my comment above.  and BTW, all the closures listed, expire today, September 14.

     

    #10231

    the san berdoo and Cleveland national forest closures expire today, September 14.  see you in the air.

     

    #10233
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    Always go to the source wherever possible and NOT Cornell.edu.
    16 USC 551 should be viewed here:
    https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title16-section551&num=0&edition=prelim#551_1
    It states that 471 was repealed but that other sections and federal regulations are  still effective. This leads us to 36 C.F.R. 261.50(a) and (b) and your best source for that is here:
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2019-title36-vol2/pdf/CFR-2019-title36-vol2-part261.pdf

    I’d love to help you further but I am busy dealing with the CA FTB who wants my 93-year old mother to file a CA return even though she has lived continuously in Florida since 1989 but we use my home address to file her federal returns. I have to jump through this hoop of fire every year. Not dealing with this promptly may eat into my soaring budget. See you in the air!

    #10235
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    It does state in the Regional Order No. 20-07 (link to document): “This Order is effective from September 7, 2020, at 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time, through September 14, 2020. ”

    But I’m not seeing the changes to justify the forests reopening now: Less fires to fight? More resources available? Weather less favorable for fire to start or spread? Our government having a change of heart after reading this forum?

    Looking forward to improvements and a reopening.

    #10236
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    The prohibition is extended through September 21, 2020.
    https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd804574.pdf

    #10237
    David Webb
    Board Member

    Thanks for posting that, Jonathan.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 42 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.