February 23, 2021 at 10:01 AM #11387
Retirement (and the weather) have provided the opportunity to spend some quality time with the Windgrams and the underlying RASP model. With a little help from the RASP community, a new version of both is nearing completion.
– Much newer version of the underlying wrf software; goes from wrf 2.1 to wrf 3.6.1;
– Docker-based (though still running locally at the moment);
– Revised input data, both newer and higher resolution (land-use, green-fraction, upper and lower soil type, and elevation data);
– Revised Windgram software.
The only loss from these upgrades will be the smaller, windowed models offered in the RASP viewer. As far as I can tell these are rarely (never?) used as the RASP model seems to be primarily accessed for XC planning.
The Windgrams change quite a bit with this update. Here is an example from today’s Marshall diagram, along with an explanation (still showing the metric info). Nothing has been changed yet, so consider this an opportunity to comment.
AlanFebruary 23, 2021 at 7:18 PM #11394Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberCSS Instructor
Thank you for working on this Alan !
If your windgrams go metric, the US will follow.February 23, 2021 at 7:46 PM #11395
Relax, the explanation is still metric, but the Marshall sample shows data converted to units more familiar to our local pilots 🙂February 24, 2021 at 6:17 AM #11398David WebbGeneral Member
Metric by force! We need to enter the modern age and start counting by tens 😀February 24, 2021 at 8:20 AM #11399
I ran today’s (2/24) as there is a truck running and it should be flyable. There are some differences in the forecast:
– New windgrams are more optimistic about the top of lift
– New windgrams are more pessimistic about the wind direction and forecast stronger winds later in the day.February 25, 2021 at 8:36 AM #11406
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.