Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Saturday 29 Aug 2020 M750 #10103
    David Webb
    General Member

    I wasn’t in the area, but happened to peek at the Crestline cam and saw the smoke. Also peeked at AJX a short time later and saw the big white X:

    C9A4B26D-42FB-4257-B32A-364AF908DBDAF818A7F4-D42E-4E9D-8DE7-410E4153FFA9

    in reply to: Andy Jackson Helmet Stickers #10033
    David Webb
    General Member

    In the past month (ish), we’ve had at least one crash (with serious injury) and an approach pattern issue from non-local, non-student pilots, so that number is significant.

    In the past couple of months, we have had other P2s who have broken the rules (launching unsupervised without a sign off or launching from Crestline unsupervised) – locals.

    To me, that pretty clearly says that relaxing the rules even more is a horrible idea.

    in reply to: Andy Jackson Helmet Stickers #10026
    David Webb
    General Member

    Bo,

    I appreciate your position, and willingness to help out inexperienced pilots, but the incident rate at our site (including pilots of many different levels) would suggest that relaxing the current protocols any more is asking for trouble. Since volunteering for the board, I can’t recall a single 2 week stretch without hearing about something.

    I want the instructors to agree on terms for the site sign offs because they are the ones that are going to be issuing them. The terms in the sign off are a bare minimum for the club to get behind, and they should be encouraged to add their own standards on top of that, since they are allowing those novice pilots to fly without supervision.

    I just don’t see how the site would survive if any pilot could show up and put novices into the air. There would be absolutely no enforceable standard that we could maintain.

    This is, at the end of the day, a P3 site. I considered it a privilege to fly here as a P2 on my own and jumping through the necessary hoops is just part of the gig – we have to do that with the other aspects of our flying (getting rated, maintaining our ushpa membership, repacking our reserves, etc), and following a few safety protocols to fly an intermediate site is no different. P2 flying options down here in San Diego are not great, but that didn’t mean I ran out to Blossom as a beginner just to get flights in since I could have.

    Ultimately the end result, if we can’t all play by the rules, is that we’re going to get told new rules. That’s going to mean no unsupervised P2 flying at all, and I think that would suck.

    in reply to: Andy Jackson Helmet Stickers #10022
    David Webb
    General Member

    The variations in the sign offs is new to me, so we’re working with the local instructors to figure out what the best approach is in regards to how P2s are evaluated as good-to-go unsupervised (i.e., if there is a flight # requirement, how many if there is, etc).

    Really though, the important part of all of this is that the local instructors are the best people to be making those determinations, as they are intimately familiar with the site and make their living by teaching and evaluating new pilots. We will work to get the “letter of the law” ironed out with them so that there is no ambiguity on those requirements.

    in reply to: Andy Jackson Helmet Stickers #10002
    David Webb
    General Member

    Yep – those are all great ideas, but likely would not work at AJX (just from a logistical/practical standpoint). For example, we discussed the sticker idea a while back, but a few things that might stand in the way of that working:

    • Pilots not wanting to put stickers on their gear
    • Someone would need to be on-hand to distribute them
    • The stickers would have to be purchased, printed out, and kept on hand somewhere accessible
    • Enforcement – a person would need to be on-hand to check

    I had sent USHPA/RRG a request/suggestion through their local representation to find a way to push the message (maybe through USHPA instructors, publications like their magazine, etc) of the importance of doing some homework before flying a new site (reading site briefings) and not flying before an in-person site briefing. Maybe if there are others here that would request the same, that this issue would get some traction. Seems like a great article topic for USHPA mag.

    in reply to: Incident Report: HG Crash at AJX, August 14, 2020 #9992
    David Webb
    General Member

    Some of these incidents – it’s been really hard to get solid details. If anyone has anything to add, please email safety@crestlinesoaring.org and I’d be happy to update the report.

    in reply to: More Approach Pattern Stuff #9974
    David Webb
    General Member

    Hi Mitch,

    I replied to your email, but replying here as well in case anyone else had the same questions.

    This was an email blast sent to all members (past and current – anyone who has signed up on the site). You are not being singled out.

    Since the approach pattern and which sides PGs and HGs need to stick to when landing is a recurring issue, we’re trying to get this information in front of as many pilots that fly here as possible. Purely informational.

    in reply to: TIME TO RECONSIDER RULES FOR P2/H2 PILOTS #9951
    David Webb
    General Member

    Regardless of everyone’s opinions on USHPA requirements for P2s, certifications, our site ratings, or instructional protocols, I have to ask here that everyone respect the rules that are in place right now. Going rogue and choosing to put beginner pilots in the air, especially if you have no instructor rating, PASA certification, or insurance, puts pilots’ lives at risk, and jeopardizes our site, regardless if you tell them to land outside of AJX. It’s also incredibly disrespectful to the other local instructors that have jumped through all of the appropriate hoops (and I hear there are a LOT) and taken the time to follow procedure and do things properly.

    If the gang here thinks there’s value in getting USHPA to re-rate some of our launches – have the discussion and try your luck (I think it’s a waste of time, but I won’t stand in anyone’s way), but please DO NOT go breaking the rules in the meantime.

    I’m all for mentoring, but mentoring should be to help pilots that can already fly here on their own to improve their skills, not as a loophole to get around seeking proper instruction and USHPA ratings.

    in reply to: Radio Frequencies #9927
    David Webb
    General Member

    Thanks Steve! I’ll add it to the list.

    in reply to: Soarable Morning #9926
    David Webb
    General Member

    I object – Jana, Stan, and I were in the air before those pics. :)

    The earlier birds!

    51A7FCC7-7675-4F9D-9764-8FA034FD4370

    in reply to: TIME TO RECONSIDER RULES FOR P2/H2 PILOTS #9912
    David Webb
    General Member

    👌👌👌👌👌👌👌

    in reply to: Windgrams #9905
    David Webb
    General Member

    Looks like the windgrams are back online. Thanks Alan!

    in reply to: Windgrams #9876
    David Webb
    General Member

    Update: sounds like Alan (he processes the windgram data) was in the Apple fire evac zone, so he’s been without power and internet for several days. Glad to hear everything worked out ok for him.

    He definitely gets a pass on the windgrams being down!

    Thanks again, Alan, for providing such a valuable tool to the flying community.

    in reply to: Platform at Crestline #9834
    David Webb
    General Member

    Thanks for your efforts, Jeremy! The launch always looks super nice – I know it doesn’t keep itself like that.  🤘

    in reply to: The Great Storage Saga #9813
    David Webb
    General Member

    It’s likely you’re seeing a cached version (Firefox, Chrome, and Safari on iOS are quite bad at heavily caching documents like PDFs). Refresh a few times and you should see the updated version.