Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
David WebbGeneral Member
I made a goofy video of the relaxing morning flight đ:
David WebbGeneral MemberRequest for everyone: say hi to pilots you donât recognize. Iâm a shy introvert, but usually just doing that is enough to get pilots talking and also makes learning that they are new to the site very quick and easy. A quick briefing on the area and the AJX approach pattern, I think, would reduce a lot of trouble and danger with out of towners, and also have them walk away with a much more memorable (in a good way) flight.
We just had some HG pilots visiting this weekend that could have had a much better time for themselves and other pilots in the air if they had bothered to look at the site guidelines (one nearly clipped a PG doing figure eights in the PG approach and another overshot and landed in the bushes), so for those folks (since we canât make everyone do their homework), an unsolicited in-person briefing would go a long way.
We will also be making some adjustments to some of the pages on the site (home page and the âJoinâ page) to make skipping over the approach pattern info a bit harder.
Teamwork makes the dream work!
David WebbGeneral MemberThe inner lawyer in me interprets the following from the policy as “you would not be covered flying from a bandito site or landing out somewhere else”:
At the time of the “occurrence” giving rise to “bodily injury” or “property damage”, the pilot in command of the Unpowered Ultralight Vehicle was not operating at a location designated by the location’s managing USHPA Chapter and/or landowner as requiring a minimum pilot Flight Proficiency Rating greater than the possessed by the pilot in command…
Should probably get the RRRG guys to clarify that one though.
EDIT: Wow – I asked around and it sounds like Bo’s scenario holds up. I don’t even know what to say to that.
EDIT 2: Everyone, please don’t do that.
David WebbGeneral MemberThose are good points, Marc. Common sense isn’t so common, it would seem. Would most of us go to a new site and just launch without at least looking for a bit of information about the place first? Probably not (at least, I hope not).
Keep in mind that there is no “day use sign up sheet,” since day use is no more.
We do have the approach patterns on big posters in the LZ, but as you said, not sure how many read those. I’m not sure a sign on the stairs would help, but we could certainly try that out. In talking to pilots on launch, a scenario I’ve run into more than once is visiting pilots driving directly up to launch, so any signage in the LZ would be moot.
What seems to help (I try to do this as much as I can, but I’m only there usually once a week on the weekends) is saying hello to pilots that you don’t recognize and get them engaged in a little conversation. That makes it really easy to point them in the right direction for information, getting their membership squared away, and giving them a site intro if they haven’t had one already. We’ll need EVERYONE to participate in that to make that effective, but I think it could do the most good.
David WebbGeneral MemberThanks for adding, Thomas.
Many of these actions are already in place (it’s a matter of pilots and drivers choosing to follow them).
- All of CSS’s guidelines are clearly spelled out on this site, and we have posters up in the LZ with some of that information presented again (such as the approach information, club policies, etc). I’ve said it before, but I highly recommend that everyone read through the site guidelines, even if you’ve been a member for a long time.
- All CSS members sign a waiver when buying or renewing a membership (it’s that large popup that comes up when you click “Sign Up” to buy your membership on the site). Here are the contents of that waiver (available in the Club Library).
- This is a hard one to enforce, since the club isn’t operating the shuttles (individuals are), but it would be great if this one was more consistent. Shuttle operators and drivers dropping off P2s at Crestline for a 1PM flight, for example, is definitely not a good thing for safety.
- This is written into the By Laws – it’s a matter of will to enforce.
- I think the sign in sheet is a good idea, but from a practical standpoint (such as pilots going straight up to launch before stopping by AJX, going XC and landing out, or launching and top landing), I’d suspect that it’s usefulness would be limited.
David WebbGeneral MemberAwesome! Thanks Jeremy.
David WebbGeneral MemberHi Matthew,
Send an email to info@crestlinesoaring.org with details about the shelf and weâll get you fixed up.
David WebbGeneral MemberThanks Chris. I saw your order come through – you’re good to go.
David WebbGeneral MemberThanks Don. I’ll have to wait for confirmation from Jeff on that.
In the future (and to everyone else), please don’t drop money in the mail slot. We’re not using that anymore – moving all transactions to the website makes a LOT of things much simpler (no one has to pick up and carry cash to the bank, the storage shelves and memberships get automatically cataloged and tracked without someone having to keep track of it on paper, and reminder emails get sent out automatically to you when it’s time to renew).
David WebbGeneral MemberAll great points, Tim. Regardless of wing type, I think we can all agree on:
- Always clear your turns! ESPECIALLY when you’re in the approach pattern and ESPECIALLY late in the day when lots of pilots are coming into AJX, your head should be on a swivel.
- If you’re not comfortable with a crowded approach, consider postponing your launch until the air traffic clears up a bit, or (if conditions and your skills are good), stay up and away from the pattern until it thins out before making your approach.
- The approach pattern is DEFINITELY NOT the place to get more air time. Once you’re in it, you should approach and land as efficiently as possible. Not sure if this is the preferred spot, but if I get close and I’m either too high or still encountering lift, I’ll move into the clear area northwest of the LZ and west of the powerlines to burn altitude, as that tends to be upwind of the LZ late in the day (making it easy to move into the pattern once I’ve gotten down a bit). Also, if the pattern all of a sudden becomes mobbed with pilots, I can easily aim for the bailout on the SW corner.
We have an established traffic pattern, which creates expectations for all of us (we expect the HGs to be generally on the East side, and the PGs to generally be on the West). This isn’t really up for debate. I’m a somewhat greener pilot, but I don’t see how the approaches could be modified to make them more efficient or safe. We have to work with the terrain and weather features that we have and stick to the well-established pattern – it’s when pilots “go rogue” that we have problems. Would be like if I decided one day to start driving on the other side of the road because I thought the Brits were onto something great. Crashes would happen.
David WebbGeneral MemberFuture will produce that dayâs NOAA NWS forecast data – just like  if you look at the graph for the current day on the site, itâs the thicker line extending out to the right from the current time. That same data can also be seen in the forecast graphs on the right side of the weather page (under the windgrams). You can also see past and future data in the graphs by selecting a date underneath the graph (in case that part wasnât clear).
David WebbGeneral MemberIn-depth analysis of the paracouch.
David WebbGeneral MemberCopy that – thanks for the reply, Jeremy.
David WebbGeneral MemberThanks Shaggy!
David WebbGeneral MemberUpdate: issue was a network outage with hologram (SIM card provider that enables the cellular connection to TMobile and ATT), not the station, or the station vendorâs site. Their services are coming back online gradually now, so should be up anytime. Link to hologram’s status page, for those that are interested:
Theyâll get the 3 strike rule – 2 more and we’ll look at switching providers.
-
AuthorPosts