Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cost-Effective Surfacing of the LZ #16692
    David Webb
    General Member

    I’m not going to be the ringleader (learned my lesson), but if the club votes to go with the turf option, it’s great that you have a potential supplier to add to the consideration.

    in reply to: Cost-Effective Surfacing of the LZ #16690
    David Webb
    General Member

    Billie – no clue, and I’m no expert on artificial turf either. Just what I found after 1 random search and a few seconds of clicking. I’d defer to those with more knowledge on the subject, but with my napkin math, even if it has to be replaced every year, the club would still come out ahead on cost ($14k per year vs $14400 for our water cost). Also no idea what shipping costs are, so that would need some investigation.

    in reply to: Cost-Effective Surfacing of the LZ #16688
    David Webb
    General Member

    I’m sure there are many others, but did a few quick searches and saw this place:

    ReTURF

    The cheapest option is used turf with logos (partial logos from sports fields) at $.70 a square foot. Looks like a rough guesstimate of the SW quadrant of the LZ is around 20,000 square feet, so comes out to $14k. Compared to the water cost, that seems to pay for itself in under 8 months.

     

    in reply to: Cost-Effective Surfacing of the LZ #16683
    David Webb
    General Member

    Excellent proposal! Solves a lot of issues all at once for minimal effort / expense. Was good to point out that the club pays $1200 a month just for water (which is having minimal positive impact on the “grass”) – perhaps that is not well-known.

    Got my vote.

    in reply to: Saturday, Sept 17 2022 – Better than expected. #16661
    David Webb
    General Member

    Thanks for the photo! The day greatly exceeded the forecast.

    Track log of the afternoon.

    Nothing super interesting, but around 2:02 into the flight, we conducted a second “very scientific” glide and speed experiment (the first was a couple of weeks ago at sunset in very smooth air). This one had a few bumps, but gliding out from Crestline in the same air, this one hints at agreeing with the general thinking about pods improving glide, as it looks like when we are both at trim (beginning of the glide out), I might have had a small advantage. Glide on the first test when we were both in open harnesses was nearly identical.

    I’m on an ION 6 (low B) and Jérôme is on his new Maestro 2 (high B). Previous “test” and this one showed our trim speeds to be very close (almost identical, with the Maestro having a small advantage). Half bar, again, close with the Maestro having a small advantage. Full bar, I would have needed a jet pack to catch up. I think the Maestro 2 comes with a rear view mirror on the risers though.

    in reply to: Fire season – she’s baaaaaack #16611
    David Webb
    General Member

    Here’s a direct link to the area on the sectional, to watch for updates.

    Wow Jérôme – that’s a big one. Hope you and the flight park remain well-clear and that both fires are extinguished quickly. Looks like as of this morning, there’s a TFR for that area as well. Link to that area on the sectionals.

    in reply to: Best Low Drag Harness for 2022 #16522
    David Webb
    General Member

    Great comparison, Jérôme. Nice to have all of that data in one place to drool over thinking about potential future purchases. :)

    in reply to: PHI / Maestro 2 #16504
    David Webb
    General Member

    This wing and flight suit combo is guaranteed to enhance performance and is certified Tony Approved™ for all audiences.

    in reply to: Is CSS a current USHPA Chapter? #16500
    David Webb
    General Member

    Looks like we have a Flying Lizards fan :)

    in reply to: Artificial Grass PG Packing Area #16467
    David Webb
    General Member

    Second on the kudos – I’m a big fan and enjoyed my packing sessions yesterday (minus the zipper trouble).

    The picket fence idea couldn’t hurt – saw a bomb dropped on it yesterday while I was packing up. Since it’s solely used for packing away gear cleanly, the risk of code browns kind of defeats the purpose.

    in reply to: Nova Mentor 7 is almost here #16459
    David Webb
    General Member

    New short review of the Mentor 7 Light:

    in reply to: New PHI Symphonia 2 on the way… #16394
    David Webb
    General Member

    Short review of the Symphonia 2. Sounds very promising:

    in reply to: PHI / Maestro 2 #16380
    David Webb
    General Member

    I’m expecting some serious show-and-tell going on this weekend. Likely lots of oohs and aahs.

    :D

    in reply to: CSS Rumors & Board Meetings #16244
    David Webb
    General Member

    I emailed the USHPA executive director asking for clarification on our chapter status, since there seems to be uncertainty about it (don’t shoot the messenger / question-asker). I assumed he would know USHPA’s position on our chapter status, but I’m not in the loop on what the club has done from an administrative standpoint to re-up, do insurance, etc.

    On USHPA’s site, we are still in the map of chapters (at the top of the page on the chapter listing), but we don’t come up in the search if you search for a chapter (I searched by state, and we’re not there). Confusing / unclear there.

    in reply to: CSS Rumors & Board Meetings #16212
    David Webb
    General Member

    I thought it would be more clear-cut to just ask USHPA about the club’s current chapter status. They replied back promptly to my question:

    CSS did not renew their chapter status on the last cycle. Depending on the direction the chapter pursues moving forward, we would be willing to consider their chapter renewal if they applied.