Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LAUNCHES OPEN for Site Flying WEST of Hwy 18 #21391
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    The vegetation recovers pretty quickly. This is the hill springing back after the Old fire. P4246566

    in reply to: Can Gene & Nicole Use AJX LZ Now That It Is Nov. 1, 2024? #21317
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Afuera!

    in reply to: Can Gene & Nicole Use AJX LZ Now That It Is Nov. 1, 2024? #21223
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Cant discuss club issues on the club forum?

    Pleading the 5th?

    in reply to: LAUNCHES OPEN for Site Flying WEST of Hwy 18 #21171
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Unfortunately, it wasnt put forth as a decision for individuals to make.

    It was presented as an order, Its too bad that the BOD didnt determine it to be overreaching especially considering there are 2 so called loyers on the board. Unfortunately, there may be uninformed pilots out there who may not know that the CSS BOD does not holds the authority to impose such a restriction, regardless of how much sense it makes to Jerome.

    Now, had this supposed proposition been put forth as voluntary action, I’d bet there would be virtually 100 percent compliance.  However, that wasnt the case.

    in reply to: Friendly reminder: TFR still in effect for Line Fire #21162
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Upon whose authority?  CSS? TFR boundaries are plain as day. USFS has no control over the airspace.

    Voluntary compliance is the most anyone can request. As far as mandating?

    Nope.

    in reply to: Gene and Nicole #21146
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Ah, Yes. The heady long gone days of can and do.

    I noticed Shilo getting the ball in the parking lot.  Good girl.

    in reply to: NPRM comment period #21145
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    -edited-

    Adios Mentone Launch.

    Need to suggest night flights for freight carriers exiting on 6. Landings on 24 should only be when SW surface winds are exceeding 20kts on strong NE days, a policy option they were throwing around couple years back, and daytime exits on 6 during strong NE days.

    in reply to: NPRM comment period #21118
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    REI’s frontman,  Ted Gablin, already made one. Havent checked the accuracy though.

    We all got to know Ted from the “race to the brewery” day back in 2019.

    SBD_D

     

    in reply to: Friendly reminder: TFR still in effect for Line Fire #21082
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    AKA a LFR – “Lukes Flying Restriction”.

     

     

    in reply to: PLACEMENT OF CARPET ON THE KITING AREA #21070
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    What about artificial turf? It appears water alone isnt doing the trick 20241003_145449_resized[1]

    in reply to: Friendly reminder: TFR still in effect for Line Fire #21069
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    TFR size reduced yesterday.Oct6TFR

    and..The convergence was well marked. 16.7k base. Sailplanes were out in force Sat and Sun flying the line from Campo to Grapevine….and back! They have ADS-B onboard and can be followed on the flight trackers.

    20241006_145739[1]

    in reply to: LAUNCHES OPEN for Site Flying WEST of Hwy 18 #21057
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Luke, help me find the part in the closure order where it mentions the airspace closure departing from the boundaries shown at tfr.faa.gov.Screenshot_20241002-200148_Adblock Browser

    in reply to: FREE FLIGHT, LAUNCHES CLOSED UNTIL 30 NOV #21031
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    I see the order hasnt been clarified by less ambiguous language.

    in reply to: FREE FLIGHT, LAUNCHES CLOSED UNTIL 30 NOV #21010
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    It doesnt specify  residents of any specific area. So, i read it to include any and all. Cant read their minds, only what is written.

    in reply to: FREE FLIGHT, LAUNCHES CLOSED UNTIL 30 NOV #20987
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Use of USFS lands is what is what is covered by the order. Use of FS lands for launching gliders along with all other uses except accessing private property, are prohibited due to the fact that the launch, or the activity occurs on FS land.

    The order covers only FS property noted in Ex. A, not private property and definitely not airspace.
    <p style=”text-align: left;”>Just sayin. In case the crime and punishment  loyer POleece types start  thinking that seeing a glider in the sky constitutes proof of violating the order.</p>