Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: TIME TO RECONSIDER RULES FOR P2/H2 PILOTS #9828
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Reading some of the comments here, suggests that some are not aware of the available P2 signoff: CSS Paraglider Novice Sign Off. It covers things like time of day to fly, and use of a streamer. This process allows a local instructor to issue the signoff, after which the P2 pilot can fly unsupervised from Marshall or the 750, ahead of the general P3 requirement. The P2 pilot may have learned at the site from the start, or learned elsewhere and then work with a local instructor to achieve it: Like a “site tune up”.

    For the “P2 from elsewhere” pilot, yes he will cough up a bit of money, for learning what is special about this flying site and adjust his skills to match. Our thermal flying site’s challenge isn’t really about our nice launches or LZ, but more about choosing the right conditions to fly, and being able to predict the air you are about to launch into, before you leave the ground. Our local instructors are best suited to establish the knowledge and skill gap to cover on a case-by-case basis. If our P2 guy has awesome launching and landing skills (as most proclaim), then the adjustment and corresponding fee charged by the instructor will be minimal. If more improvement is needed, the P2 pilot will learn what is needed and compensate accordingly for the time and effort of instruction. This system is a good compromise to insure that those who fly our site have the basic tools to do so, to minimize the risk  to themselves and the site. Experience has shown that some of the worst damage done to a flying site, is by visitors who then leave their mess behind.

    Beyond the signoff, there is much more to be learned, and at that point the P2+signoff pilot should seek a mentor or trusted friend to keep enjoy flying the site and continue improving his skills. For best results, treat your mentor well.

    in reply to: TIME TO RECONSIDER RULES FOR P2/H2 PILOTS #9759
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    About the P2 requirements. The required flight count for P2 has been going up, and I believe it is due to inequalities of training sites. One can choose to train at a glorified training hill (200-300′) and obtain a P2 just from flying there, so the requirements had to be raised for them. Some P2 pilots from elsewhere arrive at our lowest PG launch and find it high. 35 flights at our site has a lot more value than some other sites. I have been pointing this out to USHPA, but it remains a core problem.

    About using the 750′ launch instead of Marshall for a new pilot. The 750′ launch is more demanding than Marshall launch, due to its flat-to-sloped shape, smaller area, terrain bump in front/right. For a new PG pilot, launching is the biggest challenge, so the 750′ does not help in this regard. Also, late afternoon the typical wind direction (more Westerly) further increases the challenge of using the 750′, which receives it as a cross-wind. The main advantages of the 750′ launch are: Quicker turn-around for increasing flight count and practicing landing approaches, usable earlier in the morning as Marshall often has an Easterly (cross-wind) breeze until about 4 hours after sunrise. No safety benefit to do unsupervised flights from the 750′, compared to Marshall.

    in reply to: Temperature Readings #9638
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Thank you David !

    in reply to: Marshall and AJX Weather Stations #9559
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Thanks David for investing time and energy into this, while posting your progress here.

    You are validating the “Nothing of great value in this life comes easily” mantra.

    in reply to: More Approach Pattern Stuff #9488
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Airspeed and pattern type (DBF or Figure 8) are unrelated. One can do Figure 8’s while keeping good airspeed and also increase their sink rate compared to a gradual (low roll) DBF pattern. I have seen a few pilots inappropriately apply significant braking while on the downwind phase of their DBF (maybe spooked by the high ground speed). #AirspeedMatters.

    As Jana mentioned, all areas in/around the LZ equally at risk of twisting air (visible dusty or invisible vortex). Lots of dust devils seen at the base of the HG training hill, after that area had recently been resurfaced and dust was available. Then back to more dangerously stealthy, waiting to snag the non-believers.

     

    in reply to: Productive Saturday – June 27, 2020 #9348
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Great work David, nice to also see the temperature being captured.

    May you stumble into the best thermals.

    in reply to: Fly Soboba before July+August, or after. #9323
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Saturday, June 27: Good conditions and a big turnout of pilots. I got close to 4 hour airtime and up to 5 k.

    3  pilots doing aerobatics: Infinity tumble, McTwist, Dynamic stall, SAT, Helicopter. Most done cleanly.

    One PG ended up in the bushes on top of the mountain, bunched up his gear, walked down to highest launch, noticed something not right with his gear and walked down.

    Open tomorrow, then re-opens in September.

    in reply to: Fly Soboba before July+August, or after. #9308
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Forecast is looking good for tomorrow (Saturday) at Soboba. And Saturday better than Sunday (windy at Soboba and Marshall).

    in reply to: Fly Soboba before July+August, or after. #9175
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    As expected… Today was good after 4:45pm. I got close to 3 hours, and up to 5300′. Softer+Wider thermals at the end, before the ridge lift festival.

    in reply to: Recommended Bug-Out Altitudes #9126
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    General advice (unless you have some high-performance wing) is not to aim for Marshall launch when leaving Crestline from its ridge height. Instead aim for Regionals (or halfway down the West-most spine down from Cloud peak), so you can go around to the West if needed, instead of getting trapped behind Marshall.

    One has to expect that the first half of the glide from Crestline towards the front range (Marshall or Cloud) will feel good (not too much altitude loss). But as you get into the last half, you enter the sinking airflow (not necessarily rotor) that happens downwind of the Marshall-Cloud ridge line, and at the same time realize it will now be challenging to go around to the West.

    Not a bad plan anyway to first aim for Regionals (or just West of Cloud peak), as in addition to being a shorter route to safety, you are likely to find lift in that area that you can then use to complete your “L” shape path towards Marshall (if needed).

    How much height over Crestline ridge makes it safe to head directly to Marshall? Depends on headwind and expected conditions, but if you are 1000′ over the Crestline launch, your odds are good.

    in reply to: Booming Sunday #9089
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Glad you got your fix Ken.  :-)

    Soboba also good today after 4 pm. I got over 3 hours and up to 5200′. I could hear radio transmissions from Marshall, so a good day for many pilots.

    in reply to: COVID-19: AJX Status #8937
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    California will allow schools, day camps, bars, gyms, campgrounds and professional sports to begin reopening with modifications starting next Friday (June 12): CNBC News article.

    If you get into a bar fight, to keep 6 feet separation, you can hurl chairs or mugs.

    in reply to: COVID-19: AJX Status #8932
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    This could be of value for out-of-state pilots who want to visit…

    Some restaurants have re-opened for dine-in service. Since this weekend I have binged on: Sizzlers, Olive Garden, Denny’s, Chili’s. Others also offering indoor dining: El Pollo Loco, Applebee’s, IHOP, Red Robin, BJ’s, Coco’s. The list is growing, but waiting on my favorite local Thai and pizza places. Note: Most (if not all) drive-through places have remained open throughout.

    I called some motels/hotels near Marshall, and about 1/3 are open to the public, while others may only accept essential service workers.

    It almost feels normal again.

    in reply to: Privacy #8835
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Similar discussions were held at the start of the international Paragliding Forum, which has 49633 registered users today. The use of real names greatly improved the signal to noise ratio, with people feeling more responsible for what they post, having their real name next to it.

    There will be people who desire saying what they want, while hiding behind anonymity and claim “privacy concerns”. Those people can avoid posting where their comments are made public. While people unafraid of stating who they are, should be allowed to share publicly what they want.

    Where there is no choice (as in the CSS member directory), then personal information should not be made public, and only visible to those who need to verify their good standing with the club.

    Impossible to make everyone happy, but the above has been proven to work elsewhere.

    in reply to: “Landing” field safety #8605
    Jerome Daoust
    General Member

    Existing guidelines mention:

    1)  All kiting should be confined to the southwest corner of the LZ.
    2) If pilots in the air are observed to be setting up their downwind, base, or final approach, all gliders should be grounded. This helps to indicate to pilots in the air that those on the ground can see them making their approach.

    People not respecting existing guidelines is the main issue. Also, independent pilots (not just students) may be kiting without instructors present, so it is not just a school/instructor issue.

    Extra info: This is the USHPA web page referenced. It states (but not where the accidents happened)…

    One case involved a midair, and the other involved a collision between a kiting glider and a glider coming in to land..