Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jerome DaoustGeneral Member
For those who like SPAM, this new Forum user is serving some. Enjoy.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberJust wondering what would be the appropriate amount for the CSS to pay for the ranch…
Some refer to Zillow’s listing and current value. Real estate values are still relatively high, but what would happen if it was the opposite and the ranch’s value had dropped from the time it was purchased by its current owners, would the CSS acquire it for less and have owners accept a loss? That does not seem right. So I am just asking, without knowing the answer…
- For the current situation where values are high, should the owners be offered by CSS the current market value? If they want to sell now, they can refuse a lower CSS offer than the market allows.
- Disregarding market value, would current owners be satisfied with CSS offering the original investment, upgrades and some interest on the initial investment? Let’s refer to this as the “Investment+Interest” price.
- Should CSS wait/hope for a market adjustment such that the market value matches the above “Investment+Interest” price, realizing that there is a risk of the property selling to someone else before? But maybe we are near this situation if Zillow correctly states the January 27 2006 sale price of 525 k$.
- Could the CSS buy the property and to avoid a big mortgage, offer shares of ownership? I have seen this at another flying site, and one can expect share owners later seeking resale with interest. Proper share owner contracts can avoid future squabbles.
Good luck in the negotiation, I hope everybody can agree and be comfortable.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberRelated: Major Decision being considered by CSS.
And a Solution to minimize rumors/concerns: Copied here for convenience:
I encourage the board to continue sharing their planning and options considered (about any topic) on this forum, and resume posting minutes of all meetings (board and general). Otherwise a portion of the membership will attend meetings but afterwards: Every time info is repeated it gets further from the original, amplifies concerns, feeds rumors. By sharing planning, members will appreciate more the work going on “behind the scenes” and identify areas where they can help. Win-Win on both sides (CSS board and members).
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberThank you for posting the above detailed message Jai Pal.
I encourage the board to continue sharing their planning and options considered (about any topic) on this forum, and resume posting minutes of all meetings (board and general). Otherwise a portion of the membership will attend meetings but afterwards: Every time info is repeated it gets further from the original, amplifies concerns, feeds rumors. By sharing planning, members will appreciate more the work going on “behind the scenes” and identify areas where they can help. Win-Win on both sides (CSS board and members).
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberMaybe the CSS board has always been in favor of having the ranch owned by the CSS.
If you make people fear loosing access to the ranch, then more will be willing to fund its purchase.
Smart.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberRelated: Facebook comments.
I’m not on the CSS board, nor aware of their internal discussions, so the following is from an independent perspective…
Members should vote on any significant decision to be made. At the same time, no harm for board members to investigate options before formally presenting them.
Len and Owen are awesome, and should not suffer a financial loss for having acquired the ranch. When the ranch is sold (it will at some point in the future):
- Hopefully the landing approach patterns will be a pre-existing condition/risk that new owners cannot complain about.
- Losing access to the training hill to the NE of the LZ, could be compensated by improving the shape of the SW corner of the LZ, to provide a smoother transition at the top.
- The pond is a fun/party feature, but unrelated to flying.
- Tractor can be stored in a locked shed after sunset to minimize risk of vandalism. Vans (more mobile than the tractor) can be parked at a secure off-site location when not in use.
- For the club to purchase the ranch property, seems like an extreme solution to address moderate problems. The club would also have to pay yearly tax and insurance on the acquired property, in addition to house/building maintenance (likely covered if rented).
Tim got a quote for covering the whole LZ, but we only need to cover the most used portions: Cost-Effective Surfacing of the LZ. Plus it would not last forever (expect 20 years), so best to minimize the area needed. Also, no need to duplicate the appearance/feel of grass and strands (which act like riffles to trap dust/dirt) and instead use smoother outdoor carpeting (needs proper anchoring to the ground, inverted U “staples” will not snag lines) that is easier to clean (with a leaf blower for example).
Happy exploring of options, and hopefully a good plan for the future will be established, which is considerate of past efforts.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberI noticed Tom making a nice low save at the base of Billboard before joining Brian (easy to spot with his high-vis harness tail) towards Strawberry.
Congratulations to John and Dylan, having their first-ever PG flight from Regionals. Seeing new pilots express their 1st flight joy is contagious.
Jerome DaoustGeneral Member“Helicopters will be working the power lines up the mountain”.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberIndeed, Soboba (where there are more cats than dogs in the LZ) also delivered better than expectations. Light and variable wind directions predicted, but sunshine allowed the thermal convection to dominate.
I got 2 hours flights on both Saturday and Sunday, with respective tops of 4700′ and 5700′. It’s fun to mix up the flying sites.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberYou assumption is correct Bob, I removed the detailed info after all items sold.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberExcellent ! Thank you.
2022/10/30 update… Not seeing the values on the Marshall graph yet.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberIt felt like flying in the Alps… Forward launch + Wider and smoother edged thermals.
I will take more of that anytime. And it was great to see all the happy people.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberGlad to see a discussion being spawned from the incident. Always good to think of ways we can improve the response.
About radios… There used to be (still is ?) a radio at the North end of the container with external speaker, set to the club frequency (145.555). But I doubt many pilots use/monitor that frequency in flight.
Different idea (which I just shared with the club Safety officer and the President)… We have a visual sign for when there is an emergency and pilots need to clear the air (White X deployed in the LZ). But how about a sign that represents “We are aware of the incident/accident, it is managed, keep flying“. I propose a large checkmark. It is better than “half an X” because pilots will not confuse it with an “X” that is halfway constructed.
We can even re-use the same material of the “White X” to form this checkmark…
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberI updated the agenda in the previous post: Added item # 11 (Turf restoration).
Extra info (from club President): No remote access for the meeting, in-person only.
But if someone wants to record the event and share, that may be appreciated by many.
Jerome DaoustGeneral MemberNew models added to the comparison table, including the promising Niviuk Arrow.
With the rainy season ahead, maybe you need an Ozone Submarine …
-
AuthorPosts