Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Tim Ward
General MemberI don’t recall Stan saying there would definitely be a club by-law up for review/update at the next general membership meeting OR that there was no plan to accept AUA alongside USHPA.
My recollection is that Stan said that a couple of board members have discussed it among themselves (and this is true, I heard about it in passing, but can’t say I’ve discussed it much with anyone on the board. My posts on here, I think, is where I personally have discussed it. I don’t think that’s the same as having a plan. I guess your mileage could vary.
I also recall him saying that any such change would have to be put on the ballot by the board, and would have to be approved by the membership, because that’s the way the club rules are written. But that’s not the same as saying, yes we absolutely will be putting this question to the membership at the next general membership meeting.
I suppose if there were a plan, it would have to take those rules into consideration, but I don’t see any big contradiction between saying “The board hasn’t yet discussed it as a board”, and “if the board collectively decides it’s a good idea to move forward on this, it has to be approved by the membership.”
Tim Ward
General MemberI don’t see the two things as being mutually exclusive.
The board, as a board, hasn’t been discussing it that I know of, because mostly board discussions happen at board meetings.
Individual people have had ideas and expressed them to others, but I’d define a board discussion as involving most of the board discussing what the board should do.
But while I don’t see any reason it can’t be discussed, I really don’t get all the acrimony about it.If someone could explain that part to me, then possibly I’d be more educated on the subject.
Tim Ward
General MemberI have a question about a hypothetical scenario. Let’s say that sometime in the future the club votes to accept AUA ratings the same way we accept USHPA ratings now. Lack of insurance (from AUA) aside, let’s say that a pilot or instructor loses his USHPA ratings for one reason or another, but he/she is still a member of the AUA. Will that pilot or instructor be allowed to continue to fly or teach at AJX? What if that pilot or instructor loses their USHPA ratings and is not an AUA member? Will they be allowed to join the AUA and continue to fly and/or instruct at AJX as before? How is that going to work?
This isn’t a board position; this is personal opinion.
I think that should be handled on a case-by-case basis.
Ratings are, or should be, a convenient, compact way to transmit information about a particular pilot’s skill level.
Before hang ratings, it could be difficult to travel to other established sites, because the local pilots could be very protective (perhaps rightfully so) of their sites. Sometimes it took a little negotiation to establish bona fides. There were pilots around who had just bought a glider and didn’t know what they didn’t know. Perhaps more so then than now, because I think now most pilots have had professional-level instruction of some sort.
I don’t look at ratings as an entitlement. They’re certainly not a license. They’re basically an instructor’s opinion of a pilot’s skill level and ability to follow rules.
If someone has all the highest ratings and signoffs and yet still demonstrates a lack of judgement that endangers other pilots, then I’d still prefer not to have to dodge them in the approach to AJX.
Conversely and contrariwise, if someone were to lose their ratings for (just imagining at random) being a thorn in the USHPA board’s side, then, while I’d possibly agree that shows a certain lack of judgement, it’s not the kind that endangers the people they’re flying with. If USHPA insurance isn’t a requirement to keep the site, then I’d probably share airspace without many qualms.
In my mind, those are pretty black-and-white scenarios. Others might be considerably more gray. There might be situations where there isn’t a really good answer, which is why keeping it on a case=by-case basis might be warranted.
Tim Ward
General MemberThe last few I’ve bought have been “airport rated”, if that means anything. I’ve always interpreted that as being a windsock calibrated to fully extend at 15 knots.
But your post got me wondering, and so I looked up FAA requirements. For those interested, look at https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/draft-150-5345-27F.pdf
That specifies wind socks, and there’s only two sizes: 18 inches x 8 feet and 36 inches x 12 feet. Since the sock at Marshall is 24 inches x 8 feet, it’s neither fish nor fowl.
Wind socks are also supposed to withstand 75 knot winds, though it doesn’t specify for how long.
Days and days of 60 knots, though, seems to have deleterious effects, at least on the ones we’ve bought.
Tim Ward
General MemberThe internet is up, though the install to the cameras and antennas is pretty ugly.
I’m not sure what bandwidth we have, or how much would be ‘enough’.
Tim Ward
General MemberWell, even it it has a lot of carbon in it, I don’t think the ATOS would be a good filter.
Tim Ward
General MemberThe lumber for the roof is here.
Getting it off the truck and up to the construction site was a small adventure in itself.
Many thanks to Gene for his experience and fearless operating.
Tim Ward
General MemberThanks to Dan and Pat and Steve, we got the rebar in the trench.
When we can get some concrete and Dan on the same day, we’ll pour it.
Tim Ward
General MemberWell, it’s too late now. They’re cut and sanded reasonably square.
The wall end seat was just a straight cut. It’s not clear to me how a router would have improved things. The column seat/ overhang was something like an inch and a quarter at the bird’s mouth, but took off around seven inches at the end.
Further developments: Jai Paul drove down and picked up the sealer from the factory, so we didn’t have to wait to start the coating, or pay for shipping.
So one side is coated, we’ll let it cure for 48 hours, flip the beams with Gracie, then coat the other side.
Progressing slowly, but progressing.
Tim Ward
General MemberAt 88 mph. Yes, April 2nd, since March is mostly behind us, now.
Tim Ward
General MemberI brought Gracie up. The USFS seemed pretty pleased with how much work she could do.
They had a big dumpster parked in the turnout.
Apparently their original plan was for people to load up pickup beds by hand, and then unload into the dumpster by hand. That would have taken a lot longer.
They really could have used two dumpsters, because we filled that one fairly quickly, and there was still stuff left over.
Tim Ward
General MemberI’ll look at it, but IIRC, that’s an ‘improved’ model from Masterlock that is more resistant to shimming and bypassing, so you have to close it with the combination showing, then change the wheels to something else.
But I could be wrong.
Tim Ward
General MemberThanks, Owen. I thought you might say that.
I’ll try to get my ducks in a row and come up with a fixed date.
Tim Ward
General MemberYes, I think I have a pretty good handle on the drill bits and the generator, but I’ll have to look a little harder for a drill motor.
I’m sure if I ask Dan politely, he’ll have something.
Tim Ward
General MemberFurther
-
AuthorPosts