Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Incident Report: HG Crash at AJX, August 14, 2020 #9997
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    I was there and watched the pilot approach high on a pizza run. Falcon 3 195 and H2 after his first flight from Crestline late in the day. The air in the LZ was calm with no thermic activity. The pilot told me he feared he was going to fly into the two PG pilots who were standing near the W/SW corner of the LZ. I missed his high flare that resulted in the injury to his arm. The glider was fine. I broke it down and stored it. Only a wheel was damaged.
    My opinion is that the pilot panicked and became fixated on the PG pilots rather than training his eyes on where he wanted his glider to go. In this case that should have been off the LZ and into an overshoot area. In other words–his glider followed his eyes. This is an extremely common cause of bicycle crashes as well as aviation crashes. Bicycles and gliders tend to go where we are looking , especially if we are fixated on an object. That’s a guarantee that we will hit the object. Train your eyes where you want to go and NOT where you want to avoid or you will hit the very object your are trying to avoid. This is well-established dogma in numerous sports and includes hitting a good drive with a golf club.

    in reply to: Cal Fire Fly By @ 9,500′ #9996
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    I tracked down the pilot of the firefighting aircraft in Jason’s video and I am waiting for him to return my call so we can discuss HG/PG compliance with FAR 103.13 including making ourselves more visible in addition to being aware of our surrounding and avoiding powered aircraft. This hazard occurs this same time every year since high altitudes tend to coincide with fires and firefighting operations.
    Please check https://skyvector.com/ for a rapid assessment of fire situations and TFRs before flying each day. It’s quick and easy.
    AFAIK – firefighting aircraft may not appear on the flight track websites. I located the helicopter that flew across my path crossing Devil Canyon the same day on the ONT flight animation history site but not the BAe 146 that came up behind Jason and passed him.

    Jason’s jet in action:N473NA Phoschek Drop

    My chopper on the tarmac:
    Track - N658AM photo

    in reply to: Soarable Morning #9921
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    Nice!

    in reply to: Wanted 08 T2c keel #9784
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    Shaggy, Mickey sold that glider to Ed W. I don’t know whether Ed still needs the keel. JD

    in reply to: Physical Altercation – Tuesday July 28 #9748
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    What time did this take place and where exactly was it?

    I ask because – I was around the LZ part of the day but neither saw nor heard about any fight breaking out. None of the other people I saw during the few hours I was there said anything about any fight either.

    in reply to: Saturday July 18, 2020 – Carpe Thermal #9711
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    Welcome Back!

    in reply to: Insurance – Everyone’s Favorite Topic #9706
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    There is nothing new about the exclusions in the USHPA liability policy and there are still some loopholes in it that cover pilots who should be excluded from coverage. When a pilot commits bodily injury or property damage to someone who has not waived their rights, the injured party simply asks the pilot for compensation for their loss. If the pilot is a responsible human being then they pay out of their own pocket. and the matter is settled. Yes, the USHPA SOPs mandate that the pilot file a report. Whether or not these are filed is a separate matter. Assuming the pilot fails to own up to the costs of their error then the injured party files suit against the pilot and not USHPA, CSS or RRRG. If the pilot is lucky the RRRG will supply an attorney to represent or defend the pilot in pre-trial and trial proceedings. If RRRG fails to represent the pilot and the pilot is found liable then the pilot may turn around and sue RRRG for breach of contract or other malfeasance.

    When I fly X/C and land on someone’s crops and damage their produce or fence, etc. I offer to pay out of pocket for the injury they suffered from my unintended accident. Let’s say I’m landing out somewhere and a freak gust sends me through a windshield or living room window they may be covered by their auto or homeowners insurance policy and I may be off the hook other than for their deductible. As long as I pay their out of pocket from my pocket and make peace, everyone’s happy. But this is abnormal behavior in this country where people of all walks of life shirk their responsibility.

    The RRRG is for unforeseeable accidents and not a cushion for intentional stupidity. We are each ultimately  self-insured and the RRRG is going to do everything in its power not to pay out unless our accident was in strict compliance with  the SOPs and FAR103. In other words, the accident needs to be an act of G-d and not a dumb-ass stunt gone awry or other fool’s errand. It is in everyone’s best interest to be on friendly terms with everyone we encounter whether we like the other person or not.

    We operate in the Wild West and that’s the way it should be. This means get along with your neighbor for gosh sake.  Say “Howdy” and get to know one another. Don’t be adversarial. you will lose and we all will lose. Their are no posses or lynching parties. Any pissed off pilot can ruin it for everyone else and then go fly some other place leaving a mess behind. Get to know you neighbor even if it’s just for one minute. It can make all the difference.

    in reply to: Dust Devils are Fun #9174
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    You weren’t kidding, weere you?!
    AJX June 11

    in reply to: “Landing” field safety #8962
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    “At Crestline I only have myself…”

    Honestly John,

    You have the rest of the club as long we can rally peer support. It’s amazing what changes can take place when peers get together and apply peer pressure to those who refuse to share the ramps, LZs and sky. Once again I want to make it clear this is NOT a PG vs HG thing by any stretch. This is a selfish, self-centered, inconsiderate, thoughtless and discourteous pilot versus the group-safety minded pilots. Safety and cooperation aren’t merely each individual’s responsibility–they are every pilot’s collective responsibility. But if pilots don’t stand together and stand up for one another then thing go to the biz.

    Okay that’s thruppence.
    Cheers,
    JD

    in reply to: “Landing” field safety #8960
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    Mark,

    I will take an educated guess at addressing your questions.

    “I asked the question of who is responsible if a HG or PG pilot landing their aircraft fly’s into a person or pilot in the LZ….I thought ALL members signed a release????”

    Either one or both party may be considered responsible for an LZ collision. Depending on who did what, it’s possible the one party may trigger the liability coverage exclusion and could be held personally liable for any personal injury to the other party. Our liability policy is filled with exclusions that may render it void. Pilots need to understand that they are in fact personally liable for any consequence of any dumb shit that they do and then maybe if they’re lucky the RRRG won’t hang them out to dry and leave them holding their schmucks or other organ grabbed by the POTUS.

    “Q: Are there new guide lines now with the RRG that void members waivers????”

    AFAIK member waivers may be voided by a civil court or by prior suspension/expulsion from USHPA or failure to renew since there is no grace period with retroactive benefits like I get with my auto insurance.

    “Q: why would the RRG become involved since all members should have signed the waivers?”

    Waivers may be ignored or voided by the courts and so RRRG must step in  to see that the courts honor both the waivers and the Doctrine of Assumption of Risk. Otherwise it becomes open season for Personal Injury Attorneys and whining pilots or aggrieved individuals to raid our insurance piggybank.

    In case pilots have forgotten, we have an even more serious situation on launch where certain pilots, regardless of what type of vehicle they are flying consider the space in front of  and top of both ramps on both Marshall and Crestline to be very own their personal playpen and well, “Fuck everybody else!” These pilots need to stop this shit yesterday or be dealt with harshly for being the next cause of loss of our liability insurance and therefore many flying sites and maybe the loss of your use of your limbs. Don’t be nice with these infantile assholes. None of the habitual offenders deserves to be treated as anything less than a threat to our flying sites and our personal safety. Keep a camera mounted above your keel to record activity above and below your glider for documentation. Smart road cyclists and bikers do this every time they ride along with smart motorists who use dashcams. I was done using cameras until this past Sunday when I got the “Fuck you!” treatment by at least two different offenders on Crestline.

    My 2p Worth,

    JD

    in reply to: Privacy #8861
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    The AZHPGA uses a dual part club forum. The sensitive topics are for club members only and cannot be seen by outsiders even if they have a logon. The rest of their forum can be seen by anyone or anyone with a logon. I forget which it is. You get the idea.

    in reply to: “Landing” field safety #8860
    Jonathan Dietch
    General Member

    Why not carry a whistle when you fly? They’re mandatory at Torrey and they are at least somewhat effective.
    I rarely hear anyone hollering when the LZ is blocked. Sometimes a good shout will get the attention of people in the way.
    It’s not just PGs kiting. I have had stray kids and others enter my landing path  and create an obstruction.
    What about RLF skills? If half the LZ is covered by 8 PGs that’s a good indication that there’s plenty of wind and this means that much less room is required to land an HG.
    I invested thousands of dollars of my own funds in re-developing and existing drogue chute design into modern materials and construction. It’s very reliable and stable yet few pilots bought one when they were available and even fewer pilots who own one use it. A friend of mine now has permanent brain damage in large part because he was discouraged from using his other perfectly good drogue and crashed face-first. In fact a similar thing happened to the former USHPA HG safely analyst.
    Honestly, the PGs need a spotter on the ground  to alert them of incoming traffic but we know this will never happen.
    And here’s another thing that points to the whining hypocrisy of HG pilots. I have lost count of the fly-ins where more than half the LZ was covered by assembled HGs and nobody took responsibility for getting pilots to break their gear down yet there were still a dozen people in the air who needed to land on far less than half the LZ. This double-standard is typical and ridiculous.
    Anyhow, take responsibility for your own landing safely and the safety of others. This is not the Wild West. Get out there and politely ask the kiters to  provide a spotter. Learn to yell real loud. Carry a whistle. Use a drogue chute. Get your RLF sign-off. And above all–don’t whine. 

    Side Note: USHPA is failing to take responsibility for its role in any number of serious and fatal accidents. It’s fortunate that we even have an organization and liability pool still in existence.

    The truth is that we are in the Wild West whether we like it or not. That means we all need to get along with our neighbors in the air and on the ground regardless of personal differences. Communicate, communicate, communicate!
    Capice?