Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jonathan DietchGeneral Member
Thanks Jerome. The day went exactly like the forecast models I use. Flew 3hrs and a 43 mile free triangle. Tagged Keller Peak and 9,041′ which was sub-freezing and hurt so I left. Also tagged Cajon tower before staggering into the LZ. Everything on video plus stereo audio with loads of cursing. I’ll post it here when it’s finally viewable on YouTube.
Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberThis frames just begs, “Meme me!”….
…and so does my final glide into the nasty surface mess 275 feet East of the LZ in a 6mph tailwind.
Luckily there was only pucker and no measurable drama yesterday.
Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberSuper fun day! Thanks for the reports.
Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberNot unlike shooting fish in a barrel. Here’s a typical track from an EN-B equivalent Novice level hang glider I found by scraping the Cleopatra database. The pilot quipped that he landed due to an aging bladder combined with fresh coffee and should have worn something beside a Mr. Rogers signature cardigan sweater.
Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberFare Thee Not-So Well. It appears to be A-Toast.
Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberYesterday’s
Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberNice way to celebrate Kenny’s birthday today. He was smiling down on us with a sweet sunset for a candle. No speech from the skies above sadly.
January 28, 2021 at 6:32 PM in reply to: Sub-Freezing Soaring over Snow – A Rare & Painful Treat! #11160Jonathan DietchGeneral Member6-minute music edit of the flight….
January 27, 2021 at 6:09 PM in reply to: Sub-Freezing Soaring over Snow – A Rare & Painful Treat! #11151Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberThanks Clark. I was really hoping that Jess would easily get up and I could follow her around with the great butterfly sail pattern and all that snow covered forest in the background. But alas she got gypped by the weather pranksters. I’m sure I can twist her arm to come back out in cold weather but when it’s more certain.
January 27, 2021 at 12:02 AM in reply to: Incident Report: PG vs Bushes Below Marshall Peak Launch, January 21, 2021 #11138Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberWhat everyone else said, David. Thanks for all your efforts as safety officer and everything else you selflessly and often thanklessly do for the club.
January 23, 2021 at 12:34 PM in reply to: Incident Report: PG vs Bushes Below Marshall Peak Launch, January 21, 2021 #11101Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberDavid,
I stand by everything I have stated in my previous post and I will include uninsured instructors along with non-member pilots as described previously.
I certainly understand your frustration but your report is missing critical facts that you later state in reply to my first comment. Are there other factual details we need to know?
I’ve said it before and I will say it again. Pilot safety is a secondary issue. Everyone needs this drummed into his/her/their head. It makes little difference if you injure or kill yourself while engaged in free-flight activity and this includes getting injured or killed while giving wire assistance if you are a USHPA member.
What matters the most is whether you injure or kill a third party while engaged in free-flight activity whether you are a member or not. A non-member student pilot is probably out of luck if they become a statistic.
There are several active lawsuits for injury to pilots where the liability waiver is nullified and the Doctrine of Assumption of Risk is also nullified. The RRRG is likely to lose over 15% of its assets from current lawsuits. In certain situations pilots are treated like third parties rather than pilots who have assumed all the risk. When this happens the RRRG and USHPA may consider whether to revoke a chapter’s status or a pilot or instructor’s liability insurance.
If and when our chapter status is revoked, we lose our site insurance. Then we also void our land lease with the DWR and Andy Jackson Airpark’s future goes into limbo. We can still fly locally and land anyplace we don’t get prosecuted for trespass. I land out fairly often and won’t be as badly affected as others might. But hundreds of pilots may be turned away from local flying or even the sport altogether. I do not know the future.
So it’s important to present ALL the facts upfront whether you need help from the community at large or not. Attacking the very group whose assistance you need in order to be an effective safety director is not helping anybody’s cause. I am of course assuming you still want enough of us to back you up. Do you?
It would be relatively easy to start either a WhatsApp or Telegram group to share information that you or we may feel is too sensitive or controversial to publish in public. There’s no harm in drafting messages that members of the safety support group can email to the USHPA directors and RRRG to make them acutely aware of individuals who pose a risk to pilot and especially third party safety.
Good luck getting it straight from USHPA or RRRG. Both corporations and their directors seem to behave if they fear being sued personally. Ironically this leads to activity and inactivity that foment the very liability they try to avoid. I have heard that the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. Let’s not pave the road any farther South than we already have.
Cheers, Jonathan
January 22, 2021 at 6:54 PM in reply to: Incident Report: PG vs Bushes Below Marshall Peak Launch, January 21, 2021 #11092Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberHi David,
Something I sometimes notice is unfamiliar, new or visiting pilots not being greeted by any local pilots. The new or visiting pilot is left to his her her own devices which may include being confused about local protocols. It seldom hurts to smile, wave and say hello to pilots we don’t recognize. Sometimes this gets them talking about concerns they may have that would be helpful for everyone’s sake if these are addressed. This goes a long way toward creating and maintaining goodwill among the freeflight community and could avert a CraigslistCertifiedPilot™ from becoming another statistic among other things.
It’s important to remember that anyone who otherwise follows FAR103 and 36 CFR Ch II is free to engage in unpowered ultralight vehicle activity anywhere it’s not otherwise prohibited even if it means getting injured or killed in the process. This is anyone’s prerogative and who are we to stand in their way*? We may however be able to help influence them along a better path beginning by merely extending a welcoming greeting. The key word here is, ‘influence’. It’s typically the best we can do unless we control the property and have the authority of law–and we have neither. Please do not forget this.* There are few exceptions including among other things the LPS Act (if we believe the prospective pilot presents a threat to themselves or to others we can call 911 who can then put them on a 72-hr hold). There have been suicides by hang glider and possibly by paraglider. If we notice a pilot is highly agitated and likely to harm themselves or another then a call to 911 is probably warranted before the fact.
Cheers, Jonathan
Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberNice photos gentlemen! I enjoyed those. I had a subdued flight–recorded and narrated live for all the grounded pilots who may happen to watch.
Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberRule #1 of the “Back Side Boys” club… Deny the existence of such a club.
Bugger That!
Jonathan DietchGeneral MemberBille,
I think you made a wise decision. I still fly X/C and land out but I give myself more margin than I used to out of concern for emergency care shortages and exposure to anything contagious in an overcrowded hospital. It doesn’t even matter what the disease is AFAIC. Too many sick people and medical staff strained? No thanks.
It will be good to eventually fly together again under better circumstances.
JD -
AuthorPosts