Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Attention Dog & Pet Owners!!! #19554
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Or dont even use the shit in the first place.

    in reply to: Attention Dog & Pet Owners!!! #19552
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Will the poison move up the food chain into raptors and coyotes?

    in reply to: Is CSS a current USHPA Chapter? #19386
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    The benefits of chapterhood:

    1. A place on a list for Jerome to ponder over.

    2.

    in reply to: Board Meeting – December 9th at 10:00 – Zoom #19348
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    An in person meeting would be better.

    in reply to: Gene and Nicole #19209
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    No wire hangers!

    in reply to: Hang On to Your Hat! #19206
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    If its blowing real hard, you go all the way over the powerlines!

    in reply to: FTHI HG #18808
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    maybe Ed Wiggins can add one of his many FTHI stories

    in reply to: Hilary the storm #18779
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    More hype than disaster. Got a foot or so in Crestline.

    Found this listing of WX events from the San Diego weather.gov site.  Lots of big events sim to this one.

     

    in reply to: Cross Country Ranch Payment #18012
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Alan,

    It would have been in 2011.

    If the membership never voted to accept the original agreement, then it was never valid in the first place? Any subsequent extension would also be moot? Can CSS get a refund? Asking for a friend.

    in reply to: Cross Country Ranch Payment #17981
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Alan,

    The votes from ’18-’20 were to continue for one calendar year, the agreement from 2011.

    The revised agreement proposed by ranch in 2017 contained no mention of water in the scope due to it being somehow illegal or against some statute to sell water. I dont know if it is or not, and I’m not going to do the legwork to find out either. If it is, my knowledge of it and choosing to keep it out of the contract in writing while letting its sale continue, makes me complicit in obfuscating that fact had I signed that proposal. So I didnt sign it and elected to continue the previous agreement that DID contain the water in the scope.  I also dont think the membership voted to accept the initial agreement in 2011 as I couldnt find any talk of it in the old email yahoo group in that year’s election results thread.

    in reply to: CSS no longer has USHPA insurance. #17889
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Insurance is just another commodity Jerome.

    When you buy groceries you shouldn’t have the cashier telling you how to cook your dinner.

    Unfortunate, that it worked out that way.

    in reply to: CSS no longer has USHPA insurance. #17880
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    The board didnt bring to member discussion that it chose another porta potty company either. Far from secret. It was discussed and voted on and passed.

    Conducting club business is the job of the elected officers. 8 positions.  There is no king.

    in reply to: CSS no longer has USHPA insurance. #17877
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    CSS isnt the only chapter to choose alternate  or even no coverage in lieu of RRRG.

    I think they forgot who works for whom. The mission statement too, like FFF did.

     

    in reply to: CSS Rat Membership – Enjoy the Perks #17695
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Long ago there was a theft of a couple unsecured gliders and solar panels from the LZ.

    With zero proof, this guy goes and assigns blame on a disgruntled member

    stating, “It had to be him”. His explanation was only that he thought this guy had

    motive by virtue of him being a disgruntled member.  I pointed out that motive in itself doesnt constitute proof by any measure.

    I was told a while back that Gene was an acceptable tenant and considered a caretaker

    of sorts. Now it turns out thats not accurate and his living there was some sort of code violation.

    Im not a county statute enforcer nor a statute sympathizer by any stretch, but seems to me like its

    a risk you take if you violate ordinance, petty or not. While back a county inspector shows up

    while we were setting up forms for the shade structure. Said he got a call about non permitted construction happening. I could have leveled some accusations and got some drama stirred about snitches and all, but absent proof its nothing but gossip and mudslinging.

    in reply to: A NEW DIRECTION (BOD Issues & Election) #17625
    Dan DeWeese
    General Member
    CSS Instructor

    Luke

    Your dream team needs a name.

    The Yes Men? The Aquarians?

    Sorry couldnt resist.