Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sunday, March 28, 2021 #11799

    Awesome, thanks for showing the day’s potential Reavis.

    You seemed to have some good upwind ground speed.

    in reply to: Congrats, Jerome! #11595

    Thank you, it is heartwarming!

    Picture of the trophy I received last week, and this is the relevant article.

    in reply to: New Weather Station Graphs #11540

    Thank you David, definite improvements being made. My suggestions…WX_Graph_Comments

    in reply to: We Won USHPA’s 2020 Website of the Year Award! #11522

    Well deserved !  Thank you David.

    in reply to: RASP & Windgram Upgrades #11394

    Thank you for working on this Alan !

    If your windgrams go metric, the US will follow.

    in reply to: Marshall Peak Wind Sock Fixed! #11272

    Good job guys!  If there is leftover material, I can use it to patch my orange flight suit.

    in reply to: Discussion Quality #11271

    I do not think Alan was suggesting to limit reading access by the public to any part of this website or discussion forum, just suggesting limiting areas within the discussion forum for non-members to create new messages.

    in reply to: Soboba, Monday 2021/2/8 #11260

    SF = Speed Flying.

    in reply to: CSS Board Member Motivations #11218

    Good discussion.

    BTW, nothing prevents schools to do good things for the club, without being on the board. Good ideas and actions can come from anyone.

    in reply to: CSS Board Member Motivations #11210

    That’s a good complementary idea Linda.

    With respect to the main proposal, a relevant posting by Mario Miralles: “… a good argument of whether people running businesses at AJX should be able to hold a position. As much as I like those running their schools here and think that some have and would make great directors, there is a potential of conflict of interest.

    This particular incident in itself is not a big deal (no injuries) and we can hope the people involved use it to improve their procedures. David (Safety Director) appropriately shared the anonymized info he could gather, and I hope to see this continue with the next director.

    The bigger issue is the tension between people, the CSS board and school(s). Here is a possible solution to reduce such tensions in the future.

    in reply to: Discussion Quality #11176

    Thank you for working on this David.

    Let’s add “No insults or belittling“. Just talking about the obvious cases (no need to establish a list of specific words), which have the purpose of attacking someone’s character.

    Seems like it was already being done, but may as well formalize in these guidelines… In the incident/accident reports, no name(s) of pilot, student, school or instructor. Probably also good from a legal standpoint.

    Also, the moderation task could be delegated to someone willing to “take the heat” away from the CSS website administrator.

    Some forums facilitate reporting, just by clicking a “report as inappropriate” icon next to a posting. Maybe there is an internal option available here.

    ReportPost

     

    in reply to: 2021 Board of Directors Election – Votes Are In #11100

    It is great to see positions getting multiple candidates, as for “Safety Director”.

    When there is more than 1 candidate for a position, it would be helpful for voters to read a statement from each one, about how they plan to help the club. For example John seems motivated to fulfill his role as safety director when reading this posting (<– this is a link). But it would be best to give an equal voice to all candidates, otherwise voting just becomes a popularity contest where people want to please a buddy running for a position.

    Since the ballots were sent before we heard from the competing candidates, club members would benefit from having it re-issued, after presentations are made.

    Thank you to all candidates for taking an active role, Jerome.

    in reply to: Launching the NW Face of Marshall #11057

    Rule #1 of the “Back Side Boys” club… Deny the existence of such a club.

    in reply to: Hike to 750 and fly to Marshall game #10975

    I failed miserably. Around noon a handful of pilots launched as conditions changed from sunny to cloudy. Most were rewarded with a slow climb in front and tagged Marshall. Ben may have been the first, congratulations! My plan was to wait until 1pm, for the sunnier conditions forecasted, but the weather decided the opposite and it just got cloudier. Earlier pilots in flight were sinking out as I decided a now-or-never launch, seeing no sun in my near future, and promptly sank to the LZ.

    At 2:10pm, Gene provided a ride up to Regionals, for a group of us seeking more fulfilment. I launched at 2:50pm, groveled on the spine below Cloud and then slowly climbed in light lift to 5200′ under cloudy skies. Transitioned to Marshall which was surprisingly better this late in the day, climbing to 5600′ in light SE wind. Glided back to Crestline, where I recovered to 5000′ at Billboard before heading back in front and landed after an 80 min flight. Happiness filled me once again.

    Nice to see a good turnout of hikers and lots of pilots enjoying this first flyable day of the year.